IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/seg/012016/v7y2022i1p35-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study Of Sustainability Reporting On The Banking Industry In Several Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Jessabel A. Amadis Gellidon

    (Jessabel A. Amadis Gellidon)

  • Yanuar Nanok Soenarno

    (Jessabel A. Amadis Gellidon)

Abstract

The level of credit risk or credit quality, which can be measured by the ratio of Non-Performing Loans (NPL), can be seen as a form of representation in companies, particularly in the banking sector. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Sustainability Report disclosure, specifically in each dimension of Economic, Environmental, and Social Disclosure, on the credit risk level of each banking company in Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia, as measured by the NPL ratio. This study collected 129 samples from banking sector companies in Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia over a three-year period, from 2018 to 2020, using the purposive sampling method. Multiple Linear Regression was also utilized in this study to evaluate and determine the impact of each component of the Sustainability Report disclosure on the NPL ratio, as well as other control variables. According to the study's findings, the overall disclosure of the Sustainability Report has a significant influence on the NPL ratio in Indonesian and Singaporean banking sector companies, but not in Malaysian companies. Although partially, Economic Disclosure has a negative and significant impact on NPL in Singapore, whereas Environmental Disclosure only has an impact on the NPL ratio in Malaysia, and the final factor is the impact of Social Disclosure, which has a negative and significant impact on NPL in Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessabel A. Amadis Gellidon & Yanuar Nanok Soenarno, 2022. "Comparative Study Of Sustainability Reporting On The Banking Industry In Several Countries," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 7(1), pages 35-52, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:seg:012016:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:35-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jseg.ro/index.php/jseg/article/view/170/116
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:seg:012016:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:35-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu Lixandroiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.