IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/seg/012016/v4y2019i2p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis Pertaining To The Comparison Between The European Union Member States And Turkey Within The Scope Of Maastricht Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Mine GENÇ

    (Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul University)

  • Sibel MEHTER AYKIN

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative)

  • Adil KORKMAZ

    (Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative)

  • Selman YILMAZ

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University)

Abstract

The research has set its sight on the assessment of Turkey’s economic performance with that of the EU member states in terms of the concepts of Maastricht Criteria. Among the criteria considered are five featured variables comprised of inflation rate, long-term interest rate, budget deficit, government debt stock, and exchange rate. Right off the bat, the illustrious factor analysis is applied to 2017 data, then the pivotal variables about fiscal discipline and monetary discipline are punctiliously calculated, and finally an accurate ranking of states is created for each individual indicator. It is found that Turkey relatively fails to reach the monetary discipline when it comes to analyze the ranking obtained from factor analysis, while relatively managing to accomplish the fiscal discipline. Herein the Wilcoxon W Statistics Test is used to address the question, do the rankings vary by position – Eurozone or Non-Eurozone – of states? Consequently, such an intriguing conclusion is drawn like that no matter what position a state has, it is traditionally distinguished by its monetary discipline, not its fiscal discipline as a rule. Starting from this point of view, the fiscal discipline should also be regarded as an important benchmark to be carefully observed as equally as the monetary discipline for the states in Eurozone, but it goes without saying eventually more attention is paid to monetary discipline than fiscal discipline in real-life world. However, when it comes to compare the performance of Turkey which is an outstanding state has yet to manage to be a member of EU with that of European Union member states, Turkey’s enthusiastic efforts germane to achieve a satisfactory fiscal discipline should be deeply appreciated by the EU. Whereas, given the present miserable situation of Greece which has been an EU member state experiencing the same economic convergence and standing in the identical domain of attraction with Turkey but also disastrously departing from monetary discipline for years, Turkey’s infelicitous divergence from maintaining a stable monetary discipline should be advisably regarded tolerable by EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Mine GENÇ & Sibel MEHTER AYKIN & Adil KORKMAZ & Selman YILMAZ, 2019. "An Analysis Pertaining To The Comparison Between The European Union Member States And Turkey Within The Scope Of Maastricht Criteria," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:seg:012016:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jseg.ro/index.php/jseg/article/view/72/61
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:seg:012016:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu Lixandroiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.