IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/seb/journl/v14y2016i1p59-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Online Crowdsourcing Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelos Mourelatos

    (University of Patras, Greece)

  • Manolis Tzagarakis

    (University of Patras, Greece)

  • Efthalia Dimara

    (University of Patras, Greece)

Abstract

Over the years a great number of different websites have emerged that offer crowd-sourcing services, which aim at taking advantage of the vast number of anonymous workers globally available to complete tasks. In this paper we review and analyze existing websites providing crowdsourcing services in an attempt to establish a framework that will allow systematic discussion, comparison and assessment of existing crowdsourcing platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelos Mourelatos & Manolis Tzagarakis & Efthalia Dimara, 2016. "A Review of Online Crowdsourcing Platforms," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 14(1), pages 59-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:seb:journl:v:14:y:2016:i:1:p:59-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asecu.gr/Seeje/issue26/issue26-mourelatos-tzagarakis-dimara.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damianos P. Sakas & Dimitrios P. Reklitis, 2021. "The Impact of Organic Traffic of Crowdsourcing Platforms on Airlines’ Website Traffic and User Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Evangelos Mourelatos & Manolis Tzagarakis, 2018. "An investigation of factors affecting the visits of online crowdsourcing and labor platforms," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 95-130, December.
    3. Mourelatos, Evangelos, 2021. "Personality and Ethics on Online Labor Markets: How mood influences ethical perceptions," EconStor Preprints 244735, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Online Labour; Websites; Crowdsourcing; Review; Evaluation Criteria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A19 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Other
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • J49 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Other
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:seb:journl:v:14:y:2016:i:1:p:59-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ms. Melina Petromelidou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asecuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.