IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdo/regaec/v26y2017i3_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance Of The Regions’ Economic Activity Evaluation In Russia, 2012-2016

Author

Listed:
  • KURCHENKOV, Vladimir Viktorovich
  • FETISOVA, Olga Vladimirovna
  • ORLOVA, Anastasiya Andreyevna
  • GLADKAYA, Elena Andreevna

Abstract

The article presents the systems of evaluating the regions’ economic activity, which comprise various components. The regions’ economic activity evaluation is done mostly through different rankings, which can generally be classified into: global and national. The analysis of the rankings’ dynamics in 2012-2016 has shown that the Russian innovation activity is rising on the international level. Such a tendency is considered to be positive in the modern economic conditions, however the innovation activity needs to be accelerated. According to the national level rankings, there are 3 regions in the Russian Federation, which managed to apply their innovation potential better than other Russian Federation regions. Thus, various level rankings help defining the strengths and weaknesses of a region’s innovation development, that in future can become the basis for leading coordinated innovation policy.

Suggested Citation

  • KURCHENKOV, Vladimir Viktorovich & FETISOVA, Olga Vladimirovna & ORLOVA, Anastasiya Andreyevna & GLADKAYA, Elena Andreevna, 2017. "The Importance Of The Regions’ Economic Activity Evaluation In Russia, 2012-2016," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 26(3), pages 33-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:26:y:2017:i:3_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/4458
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vladimir PLOTNIKOV & Gilan FEDOTOVA & Elena POPKOVA & Angelina KASTYURINA, 2015. "Harmonization of Strategic Planning Indicators of Territories’ Socioeconomic Growth," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(2), pages 105-114.
    2. Franco Ernesto Rubino & Maurizio Rija & Giovanni Bronzetti & Graziella Sicoli & Paolo Tenuta, 2016. "An innovative model for a sustainability report in no-profit organisations," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2/3), pages 119-134.
    3. Igor ANTONENKO, 2014. "Innovation Development Sectoral Trajectories Of The South Russian Regions," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 14(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeny V. Frank & Oksana V. Mashevskaya & Lilia V. Ermolina, 2016. "Innovational Mechanism of Implementation of Cluster Initiatives in Business," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 179-188.
    2. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Nikolaevich Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2018. "Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2111-2132, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovations; innovation activity; rating analysis; innovation activity evaluation methods.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:26:y:2017:i:3_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.