IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2018i5p74-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Минимизация угроз теневой экономики в условиях развития цифровых технологий // Minimizing the Threats of the Shadow Economy under Conditions of Digital Technologies Development

Author

Listed:
  • V. Prasolov I.

    (Financial University)

  • S. Kashurnikov N.

    (Financial University)

  • В. Прасолов И.

    (Финансовый университет)

  • С. Кашурников Н.

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

The paper deals with the shadow economy-related risks generated with the development of digital technologies. The subject of the research is the risks of the illegal labor market, “hidden” information resources and crypto-currencies as elements that complicate control and contribute to the development of the shadow economy. The relevance of this problem is due, first, to the current need to study and forecast the shadow economy risks in the context of business digitalization in order to seek ways to reduce the size and neutralize the negative consequences for the state and businesses; and second, to the increasing interdependence between the level of technological development and size of the shadow economy.The purposes of the paper were to establish the relationship between the shadow economy and the digital environment and to develop proposals to help business minimize the shadow economy risks under the digitalization conditions.A risk forecast has been made and it is concluded that, unless appropriate measures are taken, digitalization will only strengthen the shadow labor and capital markets making it possible to use uncontrolled markets for criminal and illegal purposes, and inflict significant damage to Russia’s economic security. В статье анализируется проблема формирования новых рисков теневой экономики в условиях развития цифровых технологий. Предмет рассмотрения — риски использования нелегального рынка труда, «скрытых» информационных ресурсов и криптовалют как элементов осложняющих контроль и обеспечивающих развитие теневой экономики. Актуальность этой проблемы обусловлена, во-первых, существующей необходимостью изучения и прогнозирования рисков теневой экономики в условиях цифровизации деятельности организаций с целью поиска путей снижения масштабов и нивелирования негативных последствий для государства и субъектов экономической деятельности, во-вторых, более сильной зависимостью между уровнем технологического развития и размером теневой экономики.Цели статьи — установление взаимосвязи теневой экономики и цифровой среды и разработка пред­ложений хозяйствующим субъектам по минимизации рисков теневой экономики в условиях цифровизации.В статье спрогнозированы риски и сделан вывод о том, что при непринятии необходимых мер цифровизация только усилит теневой рынок труда и капитала, даст возможность использовать неконтролируемые рынки в криминальных и противоправных целях, нанесет существенный ущерб экономической безопасности России.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Prasolov I. & S. Kashurnikov N. & В. Прасолов И. & С. Кашурников Н., 2018. "Минимизация угроз теневой экономики в условиях развития цифровых технологий // Minimizing the Threats of the Shadow Economy under Conditions of Digital Technologies Development," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 11(5), pages 74-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:5:p:74-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/452/435.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ceyhun Elgin & Oguz Oztunali, 2012. "Shadow Economies around the World: Model Based Estimates," Working Papers 2012/05, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ceyhun Elgin & Ferda Erturk, 2016. "Is Informality a Barrier to Convergence?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2556-2568.
    2. Branimir Jovanovic, 2015. "Kalman Filter Estimation of the Unrecorded Economy in Macedonia," Working Papers 2015-02, National Bank of the Republic of North Macedonia.
    3. Owolabi, Adegboyega O. & Berdiev, Aziz N. & Saunoris, James W., 2022. "Is the shadow economy procyclical or countercyclical over the business cycle? International evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 257-270.
    4. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2013. "Earth Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14673.
    5. Ndoya, Hermann & Okere, Donald & Belomo, Marie laure & Atangana, Melissa, 2023. "Does ICTs decrease the spread of informal economy in Africa?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    6. Tobón, A, 2021. "Economía formal y economía informal: un estudio sobre la dinámica del crecimiento económico en un modelo de inspiración clásica," Documentos de trabajo - Alianza EFI 19292, Alianza EFI.
    7. Piotr Dybka & Bartosz Olesiński & Marek Rozkrut & Andrzej Torój, 2023. "Measuring the model uncertainty of shadow economy estimates," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1069-1106, August.
    8. Aziz N. Berdiev & Brandon Gomes & James W. Saunoris, 2023. "Revisiting the nexus between globalisation and the shadow economy: Untying the influences of de jure versus de facto globalisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 27-54, January.
    9. Adam Levai & Riccardo Turati, 2021. "The Impact of Immigration on Workers’ Protection," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2021021, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES), revised 07 Sep 2021.
    10. Luc Jacolin & Joseph Keneck Massil & Alphonse Noah, 2021. "Informal sector and mobile financial services in emerging and developing countries: Does financial innovation matter?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(9), pages 2703-2737, September.
    11. Ohnsorge, Franziska & Capasso, Salvatore & Yu, Shu, 2022. "From Financial Development to Informality: A Causal Link," CEPR Discussion Papers 17565, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Osama Sweidan, 2017. "Economic Freedom and the Informal Economy," Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Elgin, Ceyhun & Yucel, Emekcan, 2014. "Determinants of the weight for leisure in preferences," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-26.
    14. Eberechukwu Uneze & Adedeji Adeniran, 2014. "Exploring Domestic Financing Options for Post-2015 Development Agenda in Selected Sub-Saharan African Countries," Southern Voice Occasional Paper 18, Southern Voice.
    15. Elgin, Ceyhun & Oyvat, Cem, 2013. "Lurking in the cities: Urbanization and the informal economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-47.
    16. Orhan Erem Atesagaoglu & Ceyhun Elgin & Oguz Oztunali, 2017. "TFP growth in Turkey revisited: The effect of informal sector," Central Bank Review, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11–17.
    17. Emilio Colombo & Davide Furceri & Pietro Pizzuto & Patrizio Tirelli, 2022. "Fiscal Multipliers and Informality," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis2201, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    18. Ceyhun Elgin & M. ayhan Köse & Franziska Ohnsorge & Shu Yu, 2021. "Growing Apart or Moving Together? Synchronization of Informal and Formal Economy Cycles Abstract:," Working Papers 2021/04, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    19. Kpognon, Koffi D., 2022. "Fostering domestic resources mobilization in sub-Saharan Africa: Linking natural resources and ICT infrastructure to the size of informal economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Ceyhun Elgin & Friedrich Schneider, 2016. "Shadow Economies in OECD Countries: DGE vs. MIMIC Approaches," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 51-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2018:i:5:p:74-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.