IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/accntn/y2020i1p6-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

О классификации признаков профессиональных бухгалтерских суждений // Comparative Characteristics of Professional Accounting Judgments Classification Features

Author

Listed:
  • E. Zimina V.

    (Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University)

  • O. Frolova A.

    (Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University)

  • Е. Зимина В.

    (Нижегородский государственный инженерно-экономический университет)

  • О. Фролова А.

    (Нижегородский государственный инженерно-экономический университет)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of forming a unified conceptual model for the application of professional accounting judgment. The model takes into account not only the concept, but also the prerequisites, conditions of application and the process of judgment developing along with non-standard situations on which an accountant can express his competent opinion. The methodological framework of the study is based on the scientific developments of domestic and foreign scientists regarding the classification of professional accounting judgments and their comparative characteristics. The research methodology provides for the systematization of types of accounting judgments that affect the financial and economic activities of the organization. The result of the research is the development and justification of the author’s classification of accounting judgments singling out such classification features as organizational and legal form of a business, type and scope of economic activity, financial condition and accounting standards applied, which makes it possible to determine the purpose of professional judgment of an accountant. The further specification of classes and the development of classification features of professional accounting judgment will result in perceiving this category not only as a tool for solving applied accounting problems, but also as a conceptual platform built into the structure of accounting theory. The proposals based on the study are intended for effective use of accounting judgments as a comparatively new accounting and reporting tool to generate accounting and analytical information by the specialists of accounting departments of different organizations. The system of classification decisions will most fully define the role and designation of accounting judgments in accounting practice. В статье рассмотрена проблема формирования единой концептуальной модели применения профессионального бухгалтерского суждения (БС), учитывающей не только понятие, но и предпосылки, условия применения, процесс его выработки, а также нестандартные ситуации, в отношении которых бухгалтер может выражать свое компетентное мнение. Методологический каркас исследования построен на научных разработках отечественных и зарубежных ученых относительно систем классификаций и их сравнительных характеристик. Методика исследования предусматривает систематизацию видов суждений, влияющих на финансово-хозяйственную деятельность организации. Результатом исследования является разработка и обоснование авторской классификации БС с выделением таких классификационных признаков, как организационно-правовая форма, виды экономической деятельности, масштабы производственной деятельности организации, финансовое состояние и учетные стандарты, позволяющие определить назначение профессионального суждения бухгалтера. Уточнение классов и разработка классификационных признаков данной категории позволят воспринимать ее не только как инструмент решения прикладных учетных задач, но и как концептуальную платформу, встроенную в структуру теории и практики учета. Результаты, выработанные в результате исследования, предназначены для эффективного применения БС как сравнительно нового инструмента учета и отчетности в процессе формирования учетно-аналитической информации специалистами бухгалтерских служб. Система классификационных решений наиболее полно позволит определить назначение БС в учетной практике.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Zimina V. & O. Frolova A. & Е. Зимина В. & О. Фролова А., 2020. "О классификации признаков профессиональных бухгалтерских суждений // Comparative Characteristics of Professional Accounting Judgments Classification Features," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 7(1), pages 6-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2020:i:1:p:6-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/295/288.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2020:i:1:p:6-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://accounting.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.