IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/usvaep/v12y2012i2(16)p274-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct Implication Of European Citizens In Normative Process Within The European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei MICU

    (Academic of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

Direct participation, being understood as the possibility for non-institutional actors to take part in decisionmaking process, became the main legal mechanisms to ensure voice to citizens or persons affected in decision-making procedures of the EU institutions and bodies. The European Citizens' Initiative (ECI), as introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, allows citizens to request new EU legislation once a million signatures from seven member states have been collected asking the European Commission to do so. Two basic principles have to be respected for a proposal to be admissible. It must concern "a matter where a legal act of the Union can be adopted for the purpose of implementing the Treaties" and it has to fall "within the framework of the powers of the Commission to make a proposal," according to the regulation. In this context, further reflection should be made on what the added-value of the ECI is in general and how could it be an added value in the perspective of the European Citizenship. The analysis of the regulation on ECI reveals that one of the main it is to facilitate the collection of statements of support and organising a Europeanwide debate with the expectation that it will create enough political echoes for action. Also, more emphasis should be put on the final stage of the procedure, by providing more guarantees for quickly receiving an affirmative answer from the European Commission. Therefore, ECI represents a new democratic tool in order to decrease the democratic deficit in the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei MICU, 2012. "Direct Implication Of European Citizens In Normative Process Within The European Union," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 12(2(16)), pages 274-281, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:12:y:2012:i:2(16):p:274-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/USVAEPA_VOL.12,ISSUE_2(16),2012_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:12:y:2012:i:2(16):p:274-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.