IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ausvfe/v10y2010i1(11)p279-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Assessment Of The Social Danger Of The Concrete Act. The Renunciation To Apply A Punitive Sanction

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Iuliana LAMASANU

    (Associate lecturer at the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania Prosecutor - Legal Department, Prosecutor of the Court of Appeal Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

The concept of renunciation to bring a punitive sanction is made to remove the art. 181 of the current Criminal Code dispositions and improves a no penalty cause with an optional character which can be applied only by the court of justice, but only after the dispositions from art. 80 of the new Criminal Code have been verified and executed. The court of justice will give a verdict that contains the renunciation to bring a punitive sanction and it will bring only a warning. These means that there were shown the facts that made possible the renunciation to bring a punitive sanction and the offender is warned to have an appropriate behaviour in the future and what are the consequences of committing another crime.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Iuliana LAMASANU, 2010. "The Assessment Of The Social Danger Of The Concrete Act. The Renunciation To Apply A Punitive Sanction," The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 10(1(11)), pages 279-285, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:10:y:2010:i:1(11):p:279-285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/ANNALS%20VOL.10,NR.1(11),2010%20fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:10:y:2010:i:1(11):p:279-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.