IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v9y1995i3p473-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees' Perspectives on One Dimension of Labour Flexibility: Working at a Distance

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Hamblin

    (Centre for Human Resource, Open Business School of the Open University.)

Abstract

This article argues that working at a distance (that is, work done in the home at a physical distance from the employer, using information-based electronic equipment for some parts of the job) will become an increasingly significant phenomenon towards the twenty-first century. This development can bring benefits to both the employer and the individual, although other concerns regarding remote work for the individual and the organisation are discussed fully. Since the literature to date has considered working at a distance mainly from the employer's perspective, and largely in respect of professional and computing staffs, the article presents evidence from some empirical research undertaken as part of a larger study into labour flexibility: the analysis of secretarial employees' attitudes towards the flexibility of their work location and possible teleworking from home. The results, including the preferred option of working part of the week at home, are reviewed and their potential importance set within the wider labour flexibility and human resource management agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Hamblin, 1995. "Employees' Perspectives on One Dimension of Labour Flexibility: Working at a Distance," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 9(3), pages 473-498, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:9:y:1995:i:3:p:473-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/9/3/473.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nancy B. Kurland & Terri D. Egan, 1999. "Telecommuting: Justice and Control in the Virtual Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 500-513, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:9:y:1995:i:3:p:473-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.