IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v7y1993i1p47-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pension Penalties: The Gendered Division of Occupational Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Ginn

    (Department of Sociology, University of Surrey)

  • Sara Arber

    (Department of Sociology, University of Surrey)

Abstract

Research on gender inequality in employment has focused mainly on women's lower rates of pay, neglecting the less visible inequalities in occupational welfare such as fringe benefits. This paper examines gender differences in access to one centrally important occupational benefit an occupational pension. We analyse the 1987 General Household Survey to assess the relative importance of women's domestic roles, in terms of marriage and children, and how this articulates with the effect of labour market position in constraining their opportunity to accumulate occupational pension rights. Women employees' disadvantage in pension scheme membership is greater if they are married, have a child, work part-time, are employed in the private sector, have been in their job a short time and have low earnings. We conclude that women's pension scheme membership is reduced by the gendered division of domestic responsibilities, and the impact this has had on the type of employment women were able to undertake. Current gender inequality in occupational pension scheme membership suggests that, unless more generous state provision for retirement is made, the likelihood of poverty for elderly women will increase in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Ginn & Sara Arber, 1993. "Pension Penalties: The Gendered Division of Occupational Welfare," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(1), pages 47-70, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:7:y:1993:i:1:p:47-70
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709371003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709371003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709371003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davies, Hugh & Joshi, Heather, 1991. "The Pension Consequences of Divorce," CEPR Discussion Papers 550, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:7:y:1993:i:1:p:47-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.