IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v4y1990i4p551-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Investigation into the Segmentation of the Labour Supply

Author

Listed:
  • Brendan Burchell

    (Faculty of Social & Political Sciences University of Cambridge CAMBRIDGE CB2 3RQ)

  • Jill Rubery

    (Faculty of Social & Political Sciences University of Cambridge CAMBRIDGE CB2 3RQ)

Abstract

This paper explores the empirical evidence for segmentation in the labour supply using survey data from a local labour market. Employees were clustered using variables relating to their work histories, current job attributes, employment expectations and personal attributes. Five clusters of employees were identified, which differed markedly in their past, present and expected future labour market behaviour. The main theoretical tenets of segmentation theorists were supported, in as much as the labour market was found to foster and perpetuate the advantages and disadvantages of identifiable groups of workers. The analyses presented in the paper suggest that this structuring of the labour supply is both complex and varied, giving rise, for example to several markedly different types of secondary workers. Examples are given of how this segmentation approach to analyzing labour markets can further our understanding of related phenomena, such as the position of women in the labour market and work values.

Suggested Citation

  • Brendan Burchell & Jill Rubery, 1990. "An Empirical Investigation into the Segmentation of the Labour Supply," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 4(4), pages 551-575, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:4:y:1990:i:4:p:551-575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/4/4/551.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:4:y:1990:i:4:p:551-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.