IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v26y2012i5p699-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who rides the glass escalator? Gender, race and nationality in the national nursing assistant study

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Price-Glynn

    (University of Connecticut, USA)

  • Carter Rakovski

    (California State University, USA)

Abstract

Evidence for Christine Williams’s ‘glass escalator’ effect documents how professional men entering female-dominated occupations may advance more quickly toward authority positions and higher salaries. However, studies of men’s benefits from occupational segregation have neglected low-wage and diverse groups of workers. Using the representative US National Nursing Assistant Study (NNAS), the article examines organizational measures of inequality and discrimination – wages, benefits and working conditions – to understand whether a glass escalator exists among nursing assistants and how it is affected by gender, race, citizenship and facility characteristics. Though gender inequalities were present, citizenship, race, facility type and size emerged as the most important factors in determining advantages for workers, suggesting a revision of the glass escalator metaphor may be in order. NNAS results imply that identity characteristics like nationality and contextual factors like workplace matter and underscore the importance of using an intersectional approach to examine inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Price-Glynn & Carter Rakovski, 2012. "Who rides the glass escalator? Gender, race and nationality in the national nursing assistant study," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 26(5), pages 699-715, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:26:y:2012:i:5:p:699-715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/26/5/699.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:26:y:2012:i:5:p:699-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.