IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i5p943-967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The heterogeneous impacts of widespread upzoning: Lessons from Auckland, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Ka Shing Cheung

    (The University of Auckland, New Zealand)

  • Paavo Monkkonen

    (University of California Los Angeles, USA)

  • Chung Yim Yiu

    (The University of Auckland, New Zealand)

Abstract

Zoning reform is increasingly recognised as an important strategy to increase housing affordability and environmental sustainability. Few cities have undertaken significant upzoning of low-density neighbourhoods, making the 2016 Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) probably the most ambitious zoning reform in the world. Parcels zoned for single houses previously dominated Auckland, but three-quarters of them now allow multiple units. Existing studies have documented the building boom that followed this zoning reform, yet the relatively rare case offers additional insights. In this article, we use appraisal, census and zoning data on over 200,000 parcels in Auckland to answer three research questions about the heterogeneous impacts of the AUP. First, to what extent did upzoning increase the appraised value of properties’ redevelopment options? Second, did upzoning increase appraised property values to a greater degree in higher-income and more centrally located neighbourhoods? Finally, was zoning reform in Auckland significantly influenced by similar political pressures as in other countries? That is, was upzoning less likely (and downzoning more likely) in higher-income neighbourhoods? The answers to these three questions are substantially, it’s complicated, and yes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ka Shing Cheung & Paavo Monkkonen & Chung Yim Yiu, 2024. "The heterogeneous impacts of widespread upzoning: Lessons from Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(5), pages 943-967, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:5:p:943-967
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980231190281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980231190281
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980231190281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:5:p:943-967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.