IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v60y2023i11p2133-2157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for a new municipalism: Public–common partnerships against the new enclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Bertie Russell

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain)

  • Keir Milburn

    (Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung, UK)

  • Kai Heron

    (Birkbeck University of London, UK)

Abstract

This article considers the potential of public–common partnerships (PCPs) to act as a new municipalist intervention against the privatisation and financialisation of land in the UK. In previous publications, we have presented PCPs in abstract terms as a municipalist organisational form that could help communities eschew the disciplinary effects of finance capital to pursue alternative democratic forms of urban development. Here, we start to examine what this process looks like in practice. The article draws from ongoing participatory action research in two contrasting case studies, Wards Corner in Haringey and Union Street in Plymouth. We find that by establishing enduring organisational structures where collective decisions can be made about who owns and manages land and assets, PCPs could bolster already existing efforts to democratise urban development in both cities. As an organisational form, PCPs reframe the ‘local’ as a politics of proximity, decentre and reimagine the role of municipal institutions and foreground a politics of the common. This makes them an archetypal new municipalist strategy, well-suited to contesting the enclosure of urban landscapes. The article concludes by considering the development of PCPs within the broader new municipalist tendency.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertie Russell & Keir Milburn & Kai Heron, 2023. "Strategies for a new municipalism: Public–common partnerships against the new enclosures," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(11), pages 2133-2157, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:60:y:2023:i:11:p:2133-2157
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980221094700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980221094700
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980221094700?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:60:y:2023:i:11:p:2133-2157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.