IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i5p1013-1032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the dynamics of the interaction between the development of creative industries and urban spatial structure by agent-based modelling: A case study of Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Helin Liu

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, PR China)

  • Elisabete Silva

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

Abstract

Much of the focus of research on creative industries’ influence upon urban land use has been around the investment in specific regeneration projects or flagship developments rather than addressing the nature and location of the infrastructure, networks and agents engaged. In other words, the complexity of the institutional/temporal and spatial interaction among the involved elements is overlooked or not well understood. This paper presents an agent-based model named CID-USST (Creative Industries Development-Urban Spatial Structure Transformation) that examines the dynamics of the interaction between the development of creative industries and urban spatial structure by outputting a set of adaptive scenarios through time and space. It reveals that the spatial distribution of both the creative firms and the creative workers evolves in a repeating up-and-down pattern even when the exogenous urban economic condition is set to be steady. Moreover, the analysis also points to the policy implication that more open job/rent market information will lead to more rapid geographical clustering of the creative firms and the creative workers, which possibly may reduce the time cost in their spatial evolvement, and perhaps accelerate innovation if we accept that geographical proximity can enhance knowledge and information spill-over.

Suggested Citation

  • Helin Liu & Elisabete Silva, 2018. "Examining the dynamics of the interaction between the development of creative industries and urban spatial structure by agent-based modelling: A case study of Nanjing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1013-1032, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:1013-1032
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098016686493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098016686493
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098016686493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Miles & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 833-839, May.
    2. Helin Liu & Elisabete A. Silva & Qian Wang, 2016. "Incorporating GIS data into an agent-based model to support planning policy making for the development of creative industries," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 205-228, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2019. "Composite Index to Measure Cities’ Creative Performance: An Empirical Study in the Portuguese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Cultural City Life: Evidence from EU Cities," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 461-478, April.
    2. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    3. Ugo Fratesi & Giovanni Perucca, 2018. "Territorial capital and the resilience of European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 241-264, March.
    4. Sophie Yarker, 2018. "Tangential attachments: Towards a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of cultural urban regeneration on local identities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3421-3436, November.
    5. Beatrice Maria Bellè, 2023. "Background Conditions for Revitalisation Processes in the Case of Unused Public Buildings in Italy: An Ostromian Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Jane Bryan & Max Munday & Richard Bevins, 2012. "Developing a Framework for Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Museums," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 133-151, January.
    8. Mario Polèse, 2012. "The Arts and Local Economic Development: Can a Strong Arts Presence Uplift Local Economies? A Study of 135 Canadian Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1811-1835, June.
    9. Falanga, Roberto & Nunes, Mafalda Corrêa, 2021. "Tackling urban disparities through participatory culture-led urban regeneration. Insights from Lisbon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "Urban Waterfront Development, through the Lens of the Kyrenia Waterfront Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Kevin T Smiley & Wanda Rushing & Michele Scott, 2016. "Behind a bicycling boom: Governance, cultural change and place character in Memphis, Tennessee," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(1), pages 193-209, January.
    12. Cheng-Yi Lin & Woan-Chiau Hsing, 2009. "Culture-led Urban Regeneration and Community Mobilisation: The Case of the Taipei Bao-an Temple Area, Taiwan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1317-1342, June.
    13. Ludovico Centis & Ezio Micelli, 2021. "Regenerating Places outside the Metropolis. A Reading of Three Global Art-Related Processes and Development Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Yue Chen & Jianqiang Yang, 2018. "The Chinese Socio-Cultural Sustainability Approach: The Impact of Conservation Planning on Local Population and Residential Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Matt Patterson, 2012. "The Role of the Public Institution in Iconic Architectural Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3289-3305, November.
    16. Aspa Gospodini, 2009. "Post-industrial Trajectories of Mediterranean European Cities: The Case of Post-Olympics Athens," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(5-6), pages 1157-1186, May.
    17. Davide Ponzini & Ugo Rossi, 2010. "Becoming a Creative City: The Entrepreneurial Mayor, Network Politics and the Promise of an Urban Renaissance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 1037-1057, May.
    18. Cudny Waldemar, 2017. "The Ironbridge Gorge Heritage Site and its local and regional functions," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 36(36), pages 61-75, June.
    19. Zacharias Papanikolaou & Fani Kefala & Christos Karelakis & George Theodosiou & Apostolos Goulas, 2022. "Cities in Competition: Is There a Link between Entrepreneurship and Development?," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Chahardowli, Mehrdad & Sajadzadeh, Hassan, 2022. "A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:1013-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.