IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v53y2016i13p2885-2900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of accessing CCTV data: The urban topologies of subject access requests

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Spiller

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that careful attention needs to be paid to the handling of urban CCTV digital data. Since the early 1990s, CCTV has left an indelible mark on UK cities, and beyond. CCTV is a crime-reduction strategy, and its activation owes much to the laws and regulations that govern its function and the passivity with which it is often viewed. I consider the nature of security when CCTV signs, recorded images and the rights of citizens are interlinked in controlled urban spaces. Despite the regulatory powers of the Data Protection Act, the management of CCTV data is at times poorly operationalised and often obfuscated. The paper discusses my experiences of identifying 17 different CCTV cameras and being recorded, and my attempts to access my images through subject access requests (SARs). In what follows, I draw on different topologies of experience in expanding upon the mutable, unpredictable and intensive relations that guide the management of CCTV data.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Spiller, 2016. "Experiences of accessing CCTV data: The urban topologies of subject access requests," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(13), pages 2885-2900, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:13:p:2885-2900
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015597640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015597640
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015597640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Graham, 2012. "Olympics 2012 security," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 446-451, August.
    2. David Murakami Wood & David Lyon & Kiyoshi Abe, 2007. "Surveillance in Urban Japan: A Critical Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(3), pages 551-568, March.
    3. Jon Coaffee, 2005. "Urban renaissance in the age of terrorism: revanchism, automated social control or the end of reflection?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 447-454, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roel Heijlen & Joep Crompvoets & Geert Bouckaert & Maxim Chantillon, 2018. "Evolving Government Information Processes for Service Delivery: Identifying Types & Impact," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline Kennelly & Paul Watt, 2013. "Restricting the Public in Public Space: The London 2012 Olympic Games, Hyper-Securitization and Marginalized Youth," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 131-136, May.
    2. Melissa Wilson & Bob Catterall, 2015. "City 's holistic and cumulative project (1996-2016): (1) Then and now: 'It all comes together in Los Angeles?'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 131-142, February.
    3. David Murakami Wood & Kiyoshi Abe, 2011. "The Aesthetics of Control," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(15), pages 3241-3257, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:13:p:2885-2900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.