IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v52y2015i3p606-616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The night-time city. Four modes of exclusion: Reflections on the Urban Studies special collection

Author

Listed:
  • Phil Hadfield

    (School of Law, University of Leeds, UK)

Abstract

This article presents commentary and analysis on the Urban Studies special collection on the night-time city. The collection highlights burgeoning interest in the urban night from across the social sciences and helps consolidate what might be referred to as the ‘third wave’ of research on the evening and night-time economy (ENTE). The collection addresses the challenges of 21st century place-making after dark in a variety of international contexts. This commentary interprets individual contributions to this collection in the light of the author’s research experience within an evolving and increasingly sophisticated field of knowledge. The articles have, I suggest, power relations, social exclusion and social sustainability as their most prominent meta-themes. I propose a new conceptual model for the interpretation of situated assemblages of power, capacity and influence, as operating across four overlapping modes of urban governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Phil Hadfield, 2015. "The night-time city. Four modes of exclusion: Reflections on the Urban Studies special collection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(3), pages 606-616, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:3:p:606-616
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098014552934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098014552934
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098014552934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Liempt & Van Aalst, 2015. "Whose Responsibility? The Role of Bouncers in Policing the Public Spaces of Nightlife Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1251-1262, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:3:p:606-616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.