IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v48y2011i9p1925-1943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Disorder and its Relation to the Community-Civility-Consumption Triad: A Case Study on the Uses and Users of Contemporary Urban Public Space

Author

Listed:
  • Prashan Ranasinghe

    (Department of Criminology, University of Ottawa, 25 University Street, Ottawa, Ontario, KIN 6N5, Canada)

Abstract

This paper draws on the problematisation of squeegeeing and aggressive panhandling during the mid to late 1990s and early 2000s in Toronto, to explore the way concerns about public disorder are framed within political discourse. In so doing, it highlights and remedies an important void in the literature which connects vagrancy legislation to concerns about consumption. While this literature does well to expose how vagrancy law is enacted and deployed for consumption, it does little to explicate the production of the rhetoric of consumption itself. What requires attention is the way consumption is linked to and conflated with the rhetorics of civility and community: the former serving to optimise consumption; the latter to resolve the paradoxes of consumption. The enactment and deployment of vagrancy law, therefore, ought to be situated within what maybe called the community-civility-consumption triad.

Suggested Citation

  • Prashan Ranasinghe, 2011. "Public Disorder and its Relation to the Community-Civility-Consumption Triad: A Case Study on the Uses and Users of Contemporary Urban Public Space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1925-1943, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:48:y:2011:i:9:p:1925-1943
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098010379275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://usj.sagepub.com/content/48/9/1925.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098010379275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:48:y:2011:i:9:p:1925-1943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.