IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v27y1990i2p273-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Japanese-Australian Multifunction Polis: Context and Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Hilary P. M. Winchester

    (Department of Geography, University of Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia)

  • Brian S. Chalkley

    (Department of Geographical Sciences, Polytechnic South West, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK)

Abstract

The Multifunction Polis (MFP) is jargon for a proposed Japanese-Australian new city, which is currently the subject of a major feasibility study. The joint project is expected to result in a new city in Australia of 50 000-100 000 population, but its location and viability have yet to be determined. The MFP is viewed by both governments as highly significant for future industrial, urban and international development in the Pacific region. This article examines the background to the MFP concept, the issues being considered by the feasibility study, and the motives and perceived benefits for both partners. Some of the possible problems are also outlined, particularly those of social polarisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilary P. M. Winchester & Brian S. Chalkley, 1990. "The Japanese-Australian Multifunction Polis: Context and Issues," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 27(2), pages 273-281, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:27:y:1990:i:2:p:273-281
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989020080221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989020080221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989020080221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:27:y:1990:i:2:p:273-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.