IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v12y2006i3p333-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The peer review procedure: some thoughts on the analysis and dissemination of good practices in the framework of the European Employment Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Lefresne

    (Researcher, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES))

Abstract

The purpose of the peer review programme - created in 1999, and in 2005 incorporated into the mutual learning programme of the European Employment Strategy - is to identify and evaluate good practices by Member States and to promote their transferability within the European Union. But is it possible to isolate a good practice and to transpose it? On the basis of specific examples this article draws attention to the numerous inconsistencies that emerge between the supposedly universal register of the EES and the great variety of national registers through which it is interpreted. These findings lead to an adjustment of the expectations placed in mutual learning. The article goes on to show that the identification of good practices reflects, in considerable measure, a wish on the part of the Member States to make their national employment policies appear legitimate, implicitly raising, at the same time, some questions about the actual feasibility of a Community model.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Lefresne, 2006. "The peer review procedure: some thoughts on the analysis and dissemination of good practices in the framework of the European Employment Strategy," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 333-348, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:333-348
    DOI: 10.1177/102425890601200305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425890601200305
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425890601200305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:333-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.