IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v4y1976i4p403-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prestige or Socioeconomic Scales in the Study of Occupational Achievement?

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Featherman

    (University of Wisconsin, Madison)

  • Robert M. Hauser

    (University of Wisconsin, Madison)

Abstract

Current research on status attainment usually employs either a scale of prestige or of socioeconomic status to rank order occupation titles. Consistently, in the United States (and in limited international comparisons), correlations among variables in basic stratification models which rest upon data in the metric of socioeconomic status are higher than those reflecting occupational prestige. Earlier work advanced a substantive argument for this outcome to the effect that occupational stratification is fundamentally socioeconomic and not prestige mobility. Here we underscore the substantive argument by ruling out two artifactual explanations for these higher correlations. Neither the differential metric properties of the two scales (e.g., the longer "tails" of the Duncan Socioeconomic Index than the NORC prestige scale) nor the component properties of the Duncan scale account for these correlational differences.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Featherman & Robert M. Hauser, 1976. "Prestige or Socioeconomic Scales in the Study of Occupational Achievement?," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 4(4), pages 403-422, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:403-422
    DOI: 10.1177/004912417600400401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417600400401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/004912417600400401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jencks, Christopher & Tach, Laura, 2005. "Would Equal Opportunity Mean More Mobility?," Working Paper Series rwp05-037, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:403-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.