IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i3p672-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transnational Solidarity Organisations and their Main Features, before and since 2008: Adaptive and/or Autonomous?

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Kousis

    (University of Crete, Greece)

  • Maria Paschou

    (University of Crete, Greece)

  • Angelos Loukakis

    (University of Crete, Greece)

Abstract

This article highlights the importance of crisis-related transformations experienced during the 2008–2016 period by transnationally oriented, citizen-led solidarity organisations, a topic that has received scant scholarly attention. It offers an exploratory, comparative analysis of the main features of these Transnational Solidarity Organisations (TSOs) which rests on a comprehensive conceptual framework of ‘alternative forms of resilience’, referring to the ability to bounce back from hardship and meet human needs in challenging times. We apply a new methodology, Action Organisation Analysis, which is based on information coded from organisational websites of solidarity organisations retrieved from online directories. Using a sample of 1753 TSOs, we examine two types of approaches: adaptive (philanthropic, formal, or reformist) and autonomous (mutual-help, informal, or contentious) ones. We document differential transformations for adaptive and autonomous TSOs, as reflected in their major characteristics, that is, their value frames, partners, and routes to achieve their goals and supplementary actions, across time and in three different issue fields: migration, disabilities, and unemployment. Notable are the increasing shifts towards social change and protests, especially for unemployment TSOs, and less so for migration ones. The findings contribute to debates on the impact of crises on activist solidarity organisations by documenting the dialectics of autonomy and adaptation across contemporary social issues, as well as by highlighting the importance of TSOs’ hybrid features. This analysis will also be useful for future work on transnational solidarity organisations and their transitions in a rapidly evolving global society.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Kousis & Maria Paschou & Angelos Loukakis, 2021. "Transnational Solidarity Organisations and their Main Features, before and since 2008: Adaptive and/or Autonomous?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 672-694, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:3:p:672-694
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804211032240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804211032240
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804211032240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulla Pape & Rafael Chaves Avila & Joachim Benedikt Pahl & Francesca Petrella & Bartosz Pielinski, 2016. "Working under pressure: economic recession and third sector development in Europe," Post-Print halshs-01447612, HAL.
    2. Eva-Maria Hanfstaengl, 2010. "Impact of the Global Economic Crises on Civil Society Organizations," Working Papers 97, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    3. Sara de Jong & Ilker Ataç, 2017. "Demand and Deliver: Refugee Support Organisations in Austria," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 28-37.
    4. Pepita Ould Ahmed, 2015. "What does 'solidarity economy' mean ? : contours and feasibility of a theoretical and political project," Post-Print ird-01487182, HAL.
    5. Kees Biekart & Marlies Glasius & Geoffrey Pleyers, 2013. "The Global Moment of 2011: Democracy, Social Justice and Dignity," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(3), pages 547-567, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miriam Haselbacher, 2019. "Solidarity as a Field of Political Contention: Insights from Local Reception Realities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 74-84.
    2. Mujtaba Isani & Bernd Schlipphak, 2017. "The Desire for Sovereignty – An Explanation of EU Attitudes in the Arab World," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 502-517, May.
    3. Louis Larue, 2022. "The case against alternative currencies," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 75-93, February.
    4. Boik, John C., 2016. "Optimality of Social Choice Systems: Complexity, Wisdom, and Wellbeing Centrality," OSF Preprints 75jh7, Center for Open Science.
    5. Ogutu Christine & Mang¡¯unyi Eric Ernest, 2011. "The Effect of Global Economic Crisis on Service Delivery in Selected Non-Governmental Organizations in Kenya," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(4), pages 101-117, December.
    6. Anne Musson & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Exploring the effect of crisis on cooperatives: a Bayesian performance analysis of French craftsmen cooperatives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(25), pages 2657-2678, May.
    7. de Andrés, Pablo & Arroyo, David & Correia, Ricardo & Rezola, Alvaro, 2022. "Challenges of the market for initial coin offerings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Nur Hidayat Sardini, 2018. "The Role of Moral Outrage on the Impeachment of Garut Regent in 2012-2013," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 9(2), pages 28-37.
    9. Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2022. "The effects of the Arab Spring on female labour force participation in the MENA region," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 869-900, October.
    10. Ali Fakih & Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2019. "Analyzing the Perceptions of Egyptian Youth about the Arab Spring," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-21, CIRANO.
    11. Eberhard Raithelhuber, 2019. "Rearranging Differential Inclusion through Civic Solidarity: Loose Coupling in Mentorship for “Unaccompanied Minors”," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 149-164.
    12. Robert Larruina & Kees Boersma & Elena Ponzoni, 2019. "Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 53-63.
    13. Eva Youkhana & Ove Sutter, 2017. "Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-6.
    14. Rafael Chaves-Avila & Juan Ramon Gallego-Bono, 2020. "Transformative Policies for the Social and Solidarity Economy: The New Generation of Public Policies Fostering the Social Economy in Order to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals. The European and Sp," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:3:p:672-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.