IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i1p39-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of non-suicidal self-injurious behaviours among college students in India

Author

Listed:
  • Naphisabet Kharsati
  • Poornima Bhola

Abstract

Background: Non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour (NSSI) is a growing concern among youth and rarely reaches the attention of mental health and medical services. Aims: The study explored the occurrence, methods, characteristics and reported reasons for NSSI among a sample of college students in India. Methods: A total of 470 participants from undergraduate and postgraduate colleges completed the Functional Assessment of Self Mutilation (FASM) questionnaire. Results: Results indicated that 31.2% of the participants reported NSSI in the past year, with the mean age of onset being 15.9 years. Moderate/severe forms of NSSI were reported by 19.8% of the sample. The most common method was self-hitting (15.2%) followed by cutting or carving skin (13.2%). A majority of self-injurers endorsed multiple methods of NSSI, and there were no significant gender differences in NSSI rates. The NSSI was performed both to regulate internal emotional states (automatic reinforcement) and to influence others in the environment (social reinforcement).The most commonly endorsed reasons for NSSI were ‘to feel relaxed’ and ‘to get control of the situation’, while the least frequently endorsed reasons were ‘to make others angry’ and ‘to avoid college, work, or other activities’. Conclusion: The findings underscore the need to increase the awareness and understanding of NSSIs and to plan targeted interventions among college youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Naphisabet Kharsati & Poornima Bhola, 2015. "Patterns of non-suicidal self-injurious behaviours among college students in India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(1), pages 39-49, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:1:p:39-49
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764014535755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764014535755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764014535755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:1:p:39-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.