IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v56y2010i4p348-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crisis Intervention and Acute Psychiatry in Amsterdam, 20 Years of Change: a Historical Comparison of Consultations in 1983 and 2004—2005

Author

Listed:
  • L.F.M. Van Der Post

    (Arkin Mental Health Care Amsterdam, ivdp@xs4all.nl, jack.dekker@mentrum.nl)

  • J.J.M. Dekker

    (Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam)

  • J.F.J. Jonkers

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Medical Centre, Mental Health Care Buitenamstel, Amsterdam)

  • A.T.F. Beekman

    (Mental Health Group Europoort Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam)

  • C.L. Mulder

    (Adolescent Clinic, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam)

  • L. De Haan

    (Arkin Mental Health Care Amsterdam)

  • W.G. Mulder

    (Arkin Mental Health Care Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Medical Centre)

  • R.A. Schoevers

    (Arkin Mental Health Care Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Medical Centre, Mental Health Care Buitenamstel, Amsterdam)

Abstract

Aim: There has been a striking increase in the number of compulsory admission proceedings in the Netherlands since 1992, to such an extent that treatment in Amsterdam’s psychiatric clinics is in danger of being dominated by coercive treatment. Our aim was to establish a picture of the changes in emergency psychiatry that have contributed to the increase in the number of acute compulsory admissions. Methods: A cohort ( N = 460) of psychiatric emergency consultations with the city crisis service in 1983 was compared with a similar cohort ( N = 436) in 2004—2005. The study focused on the following variables: patient characteristics, crisis-service procedures and consultation outcomes. Results: Compared with 1983, there are now more services involved in crisis support in the public domain for psychiatric patients. The number of patients referred by the police has risen from 29% to 63%. In 1983, all consultations took place where the patients were located; at present, 60% take place at the crisis service premises. The number of psychotic patients in the cohort has increased from 52.0% and 63.3 %. There has been an increase in the proportion of compulsory admissions and a sharp decrease in the proportion of voluntary admissions from 61% to 28% of all admissions. Overall, the percentage of consultations leading to a psychiatric admission has fallen from 42% to 27%. Conclusion: The front-line outreach service of 1983 has changed into a specialist psychiatric emergency department with a less pronounced outreach component. Voluntary admissions to psychiatric hospitals have almost disappeared as a feature of the crisis service.

Suggested Citation

  • L.F.M. Van Der Post & J.J.M. Dekker & J.F.J. Jonkers & A.T.F. Beekman & C.L. Mulder & L. De Haan & W.G. Mulder & R.A. Schoevers, 2010. "Crisis Intervention and Acute Psychiatry in Amsterdam, 20 Years of Change: a Historical Comparison of Consultations in 1983 and 2004—2005," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(4), pages 348-358, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:4:p:348-358
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008098839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008098839
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008098839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:4:p:348-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.