IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v53y2007i4p340-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Camden Schizophrenia Surveys III: Five-Year Outcome of a Sample of Individuals From a Prevalence Survey and the Importance of Social Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Carol A. Harvey

    (Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne & North Western Mental Health, Australia, c.harvey@unimelb.edu.au)

  • Siobhan E. Jeffreys

    (Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK)

  • Alan S. McNaught

    (Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK)

  • Robert A. Blizard

    (Royal Free and University College Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, London, UK)

  • Michael B. King

    (Royal Free and University College Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, London, UK)

Abstract

Background: Most studies of outcome in schizophrenia have focused on incidence cohorts or samples identified through specialist mental health services; population-based samples provide a more complete picture of the effectiveness of community services. Aims: To examine whether outcome predictors, derived from studies of selected patients with prolonged schizophrenia, would emerge in a largely community-dwelling population sample. Methods: A follow-up sample of 114 adults with schizophrenia was identified via two censuses of key informants conducted for two prevalence surveys in North London, five years apart. Symptomatic, clinical and functional outcomes were assessed after five years. A composite score was derived for each individual. Multiple Linear Regression analyses were conducted in two phases to derive a best subset of predictors for global outcome. Results: After five years, 33% were worse and 62% were better overall. The four best predictors (social isolation, living apart from relatives, longer illness and being an inpatient at first census) accounted for 32% of the variance in outcome of those with schizophrenia and related diagnoses. Conclusions: Social relationships during the course of illness are an important predictor of overall outcome and relationships with friends and family each seem to make a positive contribution. Policy and service developments should focus on improving participation in community life for people with schizophrenia, particularly their social connectedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol A. Harvey & Siobhan E. Jeffreys & Alan S. McNaught & Robert A. Blizard & Michael B. King, 2007. "The Camden Schizophrenia Surveys III: Five-Year Outcome of a Sample of Individuals From a Prevalence Survey and the Importance of Social Relationships," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 53(4), pages 340-356, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:4:p:340-356
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764006074529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764006074529
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764006074529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:4:p:340-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.