IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v54y2023i4p402-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

About Gamifying an Emotional Learning Companion to Teach Programming to Primary Education Students

Author

Listed:
  • J.M. Ocaña
  • E.K. Morales-Urrutia
  • D. Pérez-Marín
  • C. Pizarro

Abstract

Background Gamification is a promising field of research that can benefit education. In particular, it can benefit teaching programming to children. Emotional Learning Companions (ELCs) are interactive systems that dialogue with the students as well as provide them with emotional support. Intervention The design of ELCs was extended with gamification to teach programming to Primary Education children. Riddles, levels, badges, and a leader board with trophies among other traditional gamification elements were incorporated into the learning companion, as well as game mechanics, aesthetics and connection with the players (students) to increase their learning, motivation and satisfaction levels. Methods A pre-post test single group experimental research design was followed to test the proposal. In total, 137 students aged between 10 and 12 years used the gamified learning companion during an academic year in Ecuador. Results The results showed a significant increase in students’ learning scores as well as satisfaction and motivation levels above 90%. Conclusion Therefore, the conclusion is that gamifying ELCs to teach programming in Primary Education can improve students’ learning scores, satisfaction, and motivation levels.

Suggested Citation

  • J.M. Ocaña & E.K. Morales-Urrutia & D. Pérez-Marín & C. Pizarro, 2023. "About Gamifying an Emotional Learning Companion to Teach Programming to Primary Education Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(4), pages 402-426, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:54:y:2023:i:4:p:402-426
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781231175013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781231175013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781231175013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 210-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Fei & Lin, Youhai & Mou, Jian & Cohen, Jason & Chen, Sihua, 2023. "Understanding the dark side of gamified interactions on short-form video platforms: Through a lens of expectations violations theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    2. Feng, Yuanyue & Yi, Zihui & Yang, Congcong & Chen, Ruoyi & Feng, Ye, 2022. "How do gamification mechanics drive solvers’ Knowledge contribution? A study of collaborative knowledge crowdsourcing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Wojciech Pizlo & Anna Mazurkiewicz-Pizlo, 2023. "Gamification - Use in Tourism Business Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 390-409.
    4. Andreas Schmid & Mareike Schoop, 2022. "Gamification of Electronic Negotiation Training: Effects on Motivation, Behaviour and Learning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 649-681, June.
    5. Sattwik Mohanty & Prabu Christopher B, 2023. "A bibliometric analysis of the use of the Gamification Octalysis Framework in training: evidence from Web of Science," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:54:y:2023:i:4:p:402-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.