IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v53y2022i6p645-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Knowledge Change in a Virtual Reality Simulation Across Four Platform Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Cleveley
  • Karin Diane Hatheway-Dial
  • Lori Wahl
  • Joey Peutz

Abstract

Introduction There has been an increase in the delivery of educational and training content using computer-based simulations across a range of platforms . Minimal studies have compared the effectiveness of multiple digital delivery platforms with one another using the same simulation . Objective This research investigated differences in knowledge change due to the platform used for delivery of a stand-alone l earning simulation . Methods A pretest–posttest design was used to evaluate 127 participants. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: desktop, tablet, mobile VR (Google Cardboard), and virtual reality headset. A pretest was given prior to participants’ completion of a learning simulation . Upon completion of the learning simulation , participants completed a posttest. Results This study indicated that all participants improved knowledge scores across the four platforms used to deliver the learning simulation. All participants positively increased their overall scores from the pretest to the posttest. There were no statistically significant differences in knowledge change between the four groups. Conclusion All participants positively increased their overall scores from the pretest to the posttest regardless of platform technology used to deliver the virtual reality learning simulation. This indicates that it is possible to effectively deliver the same learning simulation across different platforms that include a mix of 2D and immersive technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Cleveley & Karin Diane Hatheway-Dial & Lori Wahl & Joey Peutz, 2022. "Comparison of Knowledge Change in a Virtual Reality Simulation Across Four Platform Technologies," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(6), pages 645-662, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:6:p:645-662
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781221131352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781221131352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781221131352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:6:p:645-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.