IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v53y2022i5p470-512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Environmental Outcomes With Games: An Exploration of Behavioural and Technological Design and Evaluation Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Kristy de Salas
  • Louise Ashbarry
  • Mikaela Seabourne
  • Ian Lewis
  • Lindsay Wells
  • Julian Dermoudy
  • Erin Roehrer
  • Matthew Springer
  • James D. Sauer
  • Jenn Scott

Abstract

Background To overcome the high failure rate of gameful interventions, we need to better understand their design and evaluation strategies to build an evidence-base for best-practice approaches that bring about meaningful change. This systematic review asks: ‘What behavioural and technological design and evaluation theories and approaches are applied in games developed to bring about positive environmental outcomes?’. Method We reviewed 52 papers published between 2015 and 2020 that used gameful interventions to improve behaviour related to environmental outcomes. These papers were analysed to review the behavioural and technical design, and the assessment and evaluation approaches, employed by the intervention designers. Results We found that these publications report on simple aspects of the behavioural and technical design behind the intervention but fail to justify their design choices in terms of theory and evidence. Furthermore, variability across their evaluation approaches and outcomes exists. Discussion This review highlights several systemic flaws in the literature that limit our understanding of gameful interventions in the pro-environmental context. First, based on this review, we cannot be convinced that these interventions were designed according to best practice for intervention design or for technology development. Second, the justification for proposing a gameful intervention is not always clear. Finally, it is unclear whether these interventions are being evaluated based on best practice. Thus, it is not clear that we can draw confident conclusions about evidence-based outcomes of short-term engagement (in structural gamification interventions) or long-term behaviour change (in content gamification and serious game interventions).

Suggested Citation

  • Kristy de Salas & Louise Ashbarry & Mikaela Seabourne & Ian Lewis & Lindsay Wells & Julian Dermoudy & Erin Roehrer & Matthew Springer & James D. Sauer & Jenn Scott, 2022. "Improving Environmental Outcomes With Games: An Exploration of Behavioural and Technological Design and Evaluation Approaches," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(5), pages 470-512, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:5:p:470-512
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781221114160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781221114160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781221114160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:5:p:470-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.