IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v52y2021i4p465-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pilot Study to Explore Novice Debriefers’ Post-Simulation Debriefing Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Ng
  • Daniel M. Lugassy

Abstract

Introduction. Effective debriefing of simulation-based experiences is critical for learning. Approximately 33% of health professions instructors are debriefing novices. However, specific faculty development needs of novice debriefers has not been studied. This study examines how health professions instructors approach debriefing when they are new to debriefing simulation-based experiences. Methods. This pilot qualitative study used a thematic analysis approach to explore novice debriefers’ experiences in conducting post-simulation debriefings. Eligible participants engaged in one-hour semi-structured interviews. Recruitment continued until data saturation was reached. We reviewed verbatim interview transcripts, hand-coded the data, and formed codes into themes. Results. Nine novice debriefers participated. The overarching theme “I’m on my own…and they’re on their own,†reflects debriefers ’ view that they are on their own, without resources. Debriefers also believe learners should identifying their own errors. Three main themes emerged: “Deep divide between me and the learners†portrays a separation between debriefers and learners in terms of expectations, roles, and responsibilities. “Winging it†depicts debriefers ’ making-up their own debriefing approaches. “ Debriefing quality: missing pieces of the puzzle†portrays novice debriefers unaware of criteria for effective debriefing . Conclusions. Novice debriefers in this study perceived that they were on their own, having little to no debriefing training and mentorship. Study participants expressed debriefing struggles in several areas including discussing errors, facilitating learner participation, and assessing debriefing quality. Our findings shed light on simulation as a growing specialty by health profession educators and it is critical that resources are devoted to faculty development for debriefing skill acquisition . These findings can serve as a basis for future studies on debriefer skill acquisition .

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Ng & Daniel M. Lugassy, 2021. "A Pilot Study to Explore Novice Debriefers’ Post-Simulation Debriefing Experiences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(4), pages 465-477, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:465-477
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120970998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120970998
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120970998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    debriefing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:465-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.