IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i6p855-870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between the Patient and Politics – A Ready-to-Use Simulation for Human Service Practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J. Mallinson
  • Erin O’Hanlon

Abstract

Background. Caregivers in human services fields operate within a space between their clients and the larger social forces that shape clients’ lives. Empathetic practitioners should learn to identify both personal circumstances and larger systemic forces (e.g., economic inequality) beyond their control that influence patients’ circumstances. Aim. This article presents a novel two-phase simulation that can be beneficial for increasing empathy and policy knowledge among pre-practitioners in a variety of human service fields. Method. We use a mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of a pilot study (n=9) of the simulation. First, pre-, mid-, and post-event surveys are used in conjunction with t-tests to determine changes in overall empathy and knowledge. Second, we use feedback from the first-phase debriefing and end-of-program focus groups to identify emergent themes. Learners role play a state legislator or interest group and must develop legislation to address shortages in physicians and nurses. Result. We found evidence of increased knowledge of the policymaking process and understanding of how politics relates to individual healthcare access challenges. Evidence of gains in empathy were not apparent from the quantitative measures, but were expressed in participant debriefing. Conclusion. The framework presented is flexible enough to adapt and be implemented for a variety of policy problems across a diverse array of human service fields. It shows promise in raising knowledge and potentially empathy.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J. Mallinson & Erin O’Hanlon, 2017. "Between the Patient and Politics – A Ready-to-Use Simulation for Human Service Practitioners," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(6), pages 855-870, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:6:p:855-870
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878117734260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878117734260
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878117734260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:6:p:855-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.