IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i1p36-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary vs Compulsory Playing Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Rodríguez-Aflecht
  • Minna Hannula-Sormunen
  • Jake McMullen
  • Tomi Jaakkola
  • Erno Lehtinen

Abstract

Background . Serious games are often used in formal school contexts, in which students’ lack of control over the playing situation may have repercussions on any motivational gains. Aims and Method . The first aim was to investigate to what extent n = 579 fifth grade students in Mexico who received a mathematics serious game played it voluntarily. Then, we explored how students who played voluntarily ( n = 337) differed from those who did not by either gender or pre-test mathematical skills or motivation. The second aim was to find out whether two play contexts, the group of voluntary players and a second group consisting of students playing at school as a compulsory part of their regular mathematics lessons ( n = 482), differed in game experience, game performance, and cognitive and motivational outcomes. Results . Students from the volunteer group who played had higher pre-test mathematical skills and math interest than those who did not play. Students in this group did not otherwise differ. Compared to students from the volunteer group who played, students in the school group played for longer, completed more tasks, and enjoyed playing the game more. However, their advanced mathematical skills did not improve as much. Conclusion . Motivation did not improve regardless of play context, suggesting serious games should be implemented for their learning content rather than because they are assumed to be motivating.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Rodríguez-Aflecht & Minna Hannula-Sormunen & Jake McMullen & Tomi Jaakkola & Erno Lehtinen, 2017. "Voluntary vs Compulsory Playing Contexts," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(1), pages 36-55, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:1:p:36-55
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116673679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116673679
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116673679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:1:p:36-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.