IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v47y2016i3p368-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debriefing Research Games

Author

Listed:
  • Jop van den Hoogen
  • Julia Lo
  • Sebastiaan Meijer

Abstract

Background . Debriefing is an intrinsic part of games for learning and proper debriefing can also be beneficial to research games . However, the literature on how to debrief research games is sparse and only provides the professional with an abstract topic guide . Aim . The purpose of this study was to design a framework for the debriefing of research games that are used in ongoing innovation processes. Method . We used the literature on debriefing and experimental research and our experience as game designers to build a framework that tackles the context , substance and method of debriefing research games. Results . Our framework provides three contributions. First, it shows how the context in which a research game is applied sometimes impacts the functionality of the game in negative ways. This can be helped by designing both the game and the debriefing together. Second, we operationalize validity to a greater extent, as this is the core of a good research game . Third, we provide a methodology for debriefing professionals that opens up the black box of the gaming simulation session. Conclusion . The debriefing framework provides a method to collectively assess the validity, reliability and robustness of the causal claims associated with the research conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:3:p:368-388
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116651023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116651023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116651023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:47:y:2016:i:3:p:368-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.