IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v46y2015i5p591-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidential Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Shlomo Sher

Abstract

Background. Sophisticated ethics games that focus on corporate social responsibility , ethical decision-making and/or moral reasoning are virtually non-existent. The problem. The ambiguity and controversial nature of ethics as a subject matter make competition and scoring , key to motivating participants, especially difficult to implement. Approach. CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION attempts to systematically overcome some of the obstacles facing ethics game design through a scoring system intended to encourage critical ethical decision-making and moral reasoning . Structurally, the game aims to balance cohesiveness through its ongoing narrative with flexibility through its modular design. The game. Participants serve on business oversight committees within three companies loosely modeled after Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo!. The companies face similar problems with their operations in a new Southeast Asian market. Participants explore ethical decision-making and the nature and extent of corporate social responsibility in a global context. The four modules provided here focus on discrimination , corruption , compensation , marketing practices, and privacy . Practical implications. CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION is a ready-to-use ethics game that can be used either in a single day training format or in a business ethics classroom throughout a semester. Perhaps more importantly, its structure can be adapted to explore ethical decision-making in any context.

Suggested Citation

  • Shlomo Sher, 2015. "Confidential Communication," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 591-630, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:5:p:591-630
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115600923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115600923
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115600923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:5:p:591-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.