IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v38y2007i1p112-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological research challenges of flight simulation and flight instructor assessments of perceived fidelity

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Robinson

    (CAE Systems, UK)

  • Katerina Mania

    (University of Sussex, UK)

Abstract

This article postulates that perceptual fidelity is not necessarily communicated by exact physics-based simulation. Fidelity ranges widely among simulators; some re-create an environment or system so that it is difficult to distinguish between the simulator and the real system, whereas others re-create a small part of a system or present the whole system in a more compact and stylized fashion. This article aims to explore technological and perceptual fidelity metrics for flight simulators based on human judgments and technological characteristics resulting in research challenges in either facet of a system. Examples include psychophysical experiments assessing perceptual sensitivity to system faults such as latency. Focusing on commercial flight and flight systems simulation, this article presents the results of an experimental study acquiring user assessments of fidelity, involving expert users with experience of the real, operational environment and the simulated equivalent. Acquiring judgments of fidelity from flight instructors, technological development could relate to respective naturalness of a simulator toward positive transfer of training.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Robinson & Katerina Mania, 2007. "Technological research challenges of flight simulation and flight instructor assessments of perceived fidelity," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(1), pages 112-135, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:38:y:2007:i:1:p:112-135
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878106299035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878106299035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878106299035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:38:y:2007:i:1:p:112-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.