IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sajbmc/v11y2022i2p148-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflective Journaling to Assure Learning in the Affective Domain

Author

Listed:
  • R. Deepa
  • A. Mansurali

Abstract

The case presents reflective journaling as an effective tool to assess higher-order learning outcomes. There are two predominant approaches to learning namely surface and deep learning. Surface learning stops with the acquisition, remembering, reproducing and using the knowledge whereas deep learning culminates in development or change by enabling the learner to evaluate and create. The case describes a challenge encountered in the course ‘Emotional Intelligence for Managers’, which is a part of the Master of Business Administration programme in a leading business school in South India. In this course, learning happens in the affective domain and should culminate in a change in attitude or behaviour of the learner, who in turn should be capable of applying the learning to different situations. Standardized assessment components such as quizzes, viva and written tests cannot be used to assess this higher conception of learning and, hence, the instructor chose journal writing to assure learning and attainment of higher-order learning outcomes. Journal writing is a process in which learners record events, their responses to those events, and their reflections on the responses. This facilitates critical thinking and motivates deep learning. The case demonstrates the use of reflective journaling as a tool to assess learning in the affective domain and also shares evidence of the positive outcomes of reflective journaling. The case also serves as a blueprint to foster and assess deep learning in the classrooms.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Deepa & A. Mansurali, 2022. "Reflective Journaling to Assure Learning in the Affective Domain," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 11(2), pages 148-166, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:148-166
    DOI: 10.1177/22779779221104148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779779221104148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779779221104148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:148-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.