IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i3p2158244019876273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Rumor Transmission Among Younger and Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Lingnan He
  • Haoshen Yang
  • Xiling Xiong
  • Kaisheng Lai

Abstract

Social media not only leads to efficient dissemination of information but also facilitates the spread of rumors. However, it remains unknown whether and how WeChat use influences rumor transmission. Using a nationwide sample of Chinese adults ( N = 9,368), we applied a moderated mediation model to examine whether the relationship among WeChat use, rumor anxiety, and rumor transmission intention varies with age. Our findings show that frequent use of WeChat decreased young adults’ intention to transmit rumors by alleviating rumor anxiety, whereas in older adults, it increased this intention by increasing rumor anxiety. Among older adults, WeChat use had not only a direct effect on facilitating rumor transmission intention but also indirect effects through increased rumor anxiety. Our findings suggest that older adults are dissimilar from younger adults in terms of their level of vulnerability to believing rumors and the way they fall for rumors.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingnan He & Haoshen Yang & Xiling Xiong & Kaisheng Lai, 2019. "Online Rumor Transmission Among Younger and Older Adults," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019876273
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019876273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019876273
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019876273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sejeong Kwon & Meeyoung Cha & Kyomin Jung, 2017. "Rumor Detection over Varying Time Windows," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Reijo Savolainen, 2011. "Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1243-1256, July.
    3. Nicholas DiFonzo, 2013. "Rumour research can douse digital wildfires," Nature, Nature, vol. 493(7431), pages 135-135, January.
    4. Laijun Zhao & Jiajia Wang & Rongbing Huang, 2015. "Immunization against the Spread of Rumors in Homogenous Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Reijo Savolainen, 2011. "Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1243-1256, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haixia Wang & Xiqian Zou & Kaisheng Lai & Weiping Luo & Lingnan He, 2021. "Does Quality of Life Act as a Protective Factor against Believing Health Rumors? Evidence from a National Cross-Sectional Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Tushar Bharati & Wina Yoman, 2021. "Internal Migration and Labor Market Outcomes in Indonesia," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-05, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    3. Kris Hartley & Minh Khuong Vu, 2020. "Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 735-758, December.
    4. Lingnan He & Yue Chen & Xiling Xiong & Xiqian Zou & Kaisheng Lai, 2021. "Does Science Literacy Guarantee Resistance to Health Rumors? The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy of Science Literacy in the Relationship between Science Literacy and Rumor Belief," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yen-Liang Chen & Chia-Ling Chang & An-Qiao Sung, 2021. "Predicting eWOM’s Influence on Purchase Intention Based on Helpfulness, Credibility, Information Quality and Professionalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Chen, Guanghua, 2019. "ILSCR rumor spreading model to discuss the control of rumor spreading in emergency," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 88-97.
    3. Wonchan Choi, 2020. "Older adultsʼ credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1295-1307, November.
    4. McClure, Clair & Seock, Yoo-Kyoung, 2020. "The role of involvement: Investigating the effect of brand's social media pages on consumer purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Dana Nayer & Mosi Rosenboim & Miki Malul, 2022. "The damages of negative information: illustration from two markets," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(3), pages 283-295, September.
    6. Lei Li & Xue Song & Shujun Liu & Kun Huang, 2021. "Defining High-Quality Answers on a Chinese Tourism Q&A Platform in Terms of Information Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Lian, Ying & Liu, Yijun & Dong, Xuefan, 2020. "Strategies for controlling false online information during natural disasters: The case of Typhoon Mangkhut in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Wingyan Chung & Yinqiang Zhang & Jia Pan, 2023. "A Theory-based Deep-Learning Approach to Detecting Disinformation in Financial Social Media," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 473-492, April.
    9. Pan, Cheng & Yang, Lu-Xing & Yang, Xiaofan & Wu, Yingbo & Tang, Yuan Yan, 2018. "An effective rumor-containing strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 500(C), pages 80-91.
    10. Xiaohui Zhang & Qianzhou Du & Zhongju Zhang, 2022. "A theory‐driven machine learning system for financial disinformation detection," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3160-3179, August.
    11. Huo, Liang’an & Cheng, Yingying & Liu, Chen & Ding, Fan, 2018. "Dynamic analysis of rumor spreading model for considering active network nodes and nonlinear spreading rate," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 24-35.
    12. Chen Jianhong & Song Qinghua & Zhou Zhiyong, 2017. "Agent-Based Simulation of Rumor Propagation on Social Network Based on Active Immune Mechanism," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(6), pages 571-584, December.
    13. Abderrazek Azri & Cécile Favre & Nouria Harbi & Jérôme Darmont & Camille Noûs, 2023. "Rumor Classification through a Multimodal Fusion Framework and Ensemble Learning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1795-1810, October.
    14. Zhang, Yuhuai & Zhu, Jianjun, 2018. "Stability analysis of I2S2R rumor spreading model in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 862-881.
    15. Nian, Fuzhong & Ren, Song & Dang, Zhongkai, 2017. "The propagation-weighted priority immunization strategy based on propagation tree," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 72-78.
    16. Wang, Chaoqian, 2020. "Dynamics of conflicting opinions considering rationality," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    17. Jyoti Prakash Singh & Abhinav Kumar & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Attention-Based LSTM Network for Rumor Veracity Estimation of Tweets," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 459-474, April.
    18. Bei Bi & Yaojun Wang & Haicang Zhang & Yang Gao, 2022. "Microblog-HAN: A micro-blog rumor detection model based on heterogeneous graph attention network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Zhu, He & Ma, Jing & Li, Shan, 2019. "Effects of online and offline interaction on rumor propagation in activity-driven networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 1124-1135.
    20. Hu, Yuhan & Pan, Qiuhui & Hou, Wenbing & He, Mingfeng, 2018. "Rumor spreading model considering the proportion of wisemen in the crowd," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 1084-1094.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    age; anxiety; rumor; social media; WeChat;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:2158244019876273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.