IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i3p2158244014552430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Texts in the Field of Education

Author

Listed:
  • Eva KlemenÄ iÄ
  • Mitja ÄŒepiÄ VogrinÄ iÄ

Abstract

The educational discourse is one of the primary places where numerous dominant ideological premises are established. These discursive constructions are usually not expressed explicitly but are tacit or covered. In other words, ideological premises are not conveyed via ideational (dictionary) meaning of utterances. The analysis therefore has to tackle not the grammatical or logical layer of the text but has to look into the pragmatic aspect of discourse or text in the social communication. In this way, Grice developed his idea of cooperative principle in the analysis of pragmatic rules (maxims) that speakers use in head-to-head interactions to make themselves understood. The violation of those rules usually means that the speaker is making a “conversational†implicature, that is, an implication that cannot be inferred from his spoken contribution but assumes some common knowledge or presupposition. Conversational implicatures are therefore the places where ideological presuppositions can be detected. Grice’s maxims are used in the analysis of two distinct types of texts in the field of education—a regulation on textbook approval and a history textbook. In both texts, Grice’s principles are used to uncover ideological premises.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva KlemenÄ iÄ & Mitja ÄŒepiÄ VogrinÄ iÄ, 2014. "Analysis of Texts in the Field of Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014552430
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014552430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014552430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014552430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014552430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.