IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i1p2158244013476054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jealousy and Relationship Closeness

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Attridge

Abstract

This study confirmed a hypothesis from the Emotion-in-Relationships conceptual model, which predicts that greater interdependence between relationship partners—or closeness—creates the potential for jealousy. The study also sought to better define the positive side of romantic jealousy in addition to its more negative attributes. College students in premarital relationships ( N = 229) completed a questionnaire, including 27 different measures and the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. Select data were obtained from 122 cases at 3-month follow-up. Each jealousy scale was tested for associations with demographic (age, sex, and race), person (life satisfaction, loneliness, romantic attachment styles, love styles, and romantic beliefs), and relationship (affective, closeness, and social exchange theory) constructs. Results clearly distinguished emotional/reactive jealousy as mostly “good†and cognitive/suspicious jealousy as “bad.†Behavioral jealousy was associated with few measures. Implications are discussed for the interdependence model of relationships and the transactional model of jealousy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Attridge, 2013. "Jealousy and Relationship Closeness," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(1), pages 21582440134, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:2158244013476054
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013476054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013476054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013476054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Waqar Rana & Faisal Mustafa & Muhammad Umer Quddoos & Rab Nawaz Lodhi, 2021. "How Brand Jealousy is an Antidote for Premium to Pay More in the Presence of Materialism and Brand Attachment?," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(1), pages 35-45, june.
    2. Frederik Booysen & Sevias Guvuriro & Alistair Munro & Tshepo Moloi & Celeste Campher, 2018. "Putting a premium on altruism: A social discounting experiment with South African university students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:2158244013476054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.