IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i1p21582440221086660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Uniformization of Think Tanks in Turkey: The Foundation for Political, Economic, and Social Research (SETA) as a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Bulut Gürpinar
  • Ömür Aydin

Abstract

The present study analyzed the role of Turkey’s think tanks as NGOs and conducted a case study on the Foundation for Political, Economic, and Social Research (SETA), an organization that appears to dominate Turkish think thanks’ sphere of activity. Based on the general classifications accepted in the literature on think tanks, the study found that SETA is a “political party affiliation†and “advocacy†think tank. Since its establishment, SETA has been ideologically aligned with the Justice and Development Party (AK Party). It acts as a partner in the design of AK Party policies, provides human resources to the AK Party bureaucracy, and conducts public diplomacy to legitimize these policies in the public eye. According to the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program’s (TTCSP) data for 2019, 48 think tanks exist in Turkey. The fact that SETA stands out so significantly from its peers suggests that pluralism has been lost in this field and that a monopolization policy is preferred. This study concluded that if a country’s NGOs are weak, this will lead to a democratic deficit. Utilizing Carl Schmitt’s theory of “the total state,†the study analyzed the way in which the post-2016 state-of-emergency regime and the new political regime that emerged following Turkey’s constitutional amendments in 2017 have narrowed the sphere of influence of think tanks and NGOs in Turkey.

Suggested Citation

  • Bulut Gürpinar & Ömür Aydin, 2022. "The Uniformization of Think Tanks in Turkey: The Foundation for Political, Economic, and Social Research (SETA) as a Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221086660
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221086660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221086660
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221086660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221086660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.