IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i1p21582440221079842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Engagement with Teacher Written Feedback on Rehearsal Essays Undertaken in Preparation for IELTS

Author

Listed:
  • William S. Pearson

Abstract

Due to pressure to meet goals, some test-takers preparing for the IELTS (International English Language Testing System) Writing test solicit written feedback (WF) from an expert provider on their rehearsal essays, in order to identify and close gaps in performance. The extent self-directed candidates are able to utilize written feedback to enhance their language and writing skills in simulated Task 2 essays has yet to be investigated. The present study addresses one learner factor deemed prominent in mediating the learning potential of WF, student engagement. The study used assessments of student writing according to the public band descriptors and text-analytic descriptions from three Task 2 rehearsal essays triangulated with five rounds of semi-structured interviews to explore how four learners preparing for IELTS Writing engaged affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively with asynchronous, electronic written feedback provided using the Kaizena app. The study found that, while the learners highly valued WF, they were not always able to understand the intentions behind comments or envisage an appropriate response, leading to negative emotional reactions from two learners in the form of anxiety and frustration. Written progress across the essays was limited, stemming from an initial lack of buy-in to making content revisions and surface-level approaches to WF processing. Moderate behavioral engagement with indirect error treatment was exhibited, although meaningful accuracy gains were apparent for only one learner and content changes meant many errors went uncorrected. The implications for practitioners of IELTS Writing preparation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • William S. Pearson, 2022. "Student Engagement with Teacher Written Feedback on Rehearsal Essays Undertaken in Preparation for IELTS," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221079842
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221079842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221079842
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221079842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao Zheng & Qiting Zhong & Shulin Yu & Xiaohui Li, 2020. "Examining Students’ Responses to Teacher Translation Feedback: Insights From the Perspective of Student Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang Zhonger & Nurliyana Bukhari & Tang Qi, 2023. "Current State and Difficulties in Chinese MTI Teachers’ Professional Development," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(2), pages 295-295, March.
    2. Liuyan Yang, 2022. "Student Engagement With Teacher Feedback in Pronunciation Training Supported by a Mobile Multimedia Application," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221079842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.