IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i1p2158244020914543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing Faculties’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Research Ethics According to Demographic Characteristics and Institutional Environment in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Sukhee Ahn
  • Geum Hee Jeong
  • Hye Sook Shin
  • Jeung-Im Kim
  • Yunmi Kim
  • Ju-Eun Song
  • Sun-Hee Kim
  • Ju Hee Kim
  • Yun Jung Lee
  • Young A. Song
  • Eun Hee Lee
  • Myoung-Hee Kim

Abstract

This study, conducted in the Republic of Korea, analyzed nursing faculty members’ knowledge of and attitudes toward research ethics according to their characteristics and the institutional environment. A survey was conducted from April 24 to July 23, 2017. The participants were 210 nursing professors from 57 universities in Korea. The survey questionnaire gathered information on participants’ characteristics, their knowledge of and attitudes toward research ethics, and their perceived training needs. A relatively low difficulty index was found for knowledge items dealing with conflicts of interest (0.66), copyright (0.65), and plagiarism and duplicate publications (0.17) than for the other six items. Of the 12 items assessing attitudes toward research ethics, use of a plagiarism-checking program and reviewing manuscripts from members of one’s own research group had the lowest scores. The knowledge level of participants whose institutions provided a plagiarism-checking program was higher than those whose institutions did not. Former group also showed better attitudes toward research ethics. High-priority training needs were obtaining institutional review board (IRB) approval, writing informed consent forms, and obtaining informed consent for studies on children and pregnant women. A more intensive training program for nursing faculty is required on specific topics, including conflicts of interest, copyright, plagiarism, duplicate publications, IRB approval, and informed consent. Furthermore, all nursing institutions in Korea should provide a plagiarism-checking program to faculty members.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukhee Ahn & Geum Hee Jeong & Hye Sook Shin & Jeung-Im Kim & Yunmi Kim & Ju-Eun Song & Sun-Hee Kim & Ju Hee Kim & Yun Jung Lee & Young A. Song & Eun Hee Lee & Myoung-Hee Kim, 2020. "Nursing Faculties’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Research Ethics According to Demographic Characteristics and Institutional Environment in Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244020914543
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020914543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020914543
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020914543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244020914543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.