IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i1p172-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the reliability of accident analysis results: Taking two groups of four accident analysis references with the 24Model as samples

Author

Listed:
  • Qingsong Jia
  • Gui Fu
  • Xuecai Xie
  • Shihan Hu
  • Yuxin Wang
  • Qian Lyu

Abstract

Accident prevention depends on accident analysis. In order to improve the reliability of accident analysis and find the common problems related to reliability in accident analysis, two groups of four papers of master’s and doctor’s theses which applied 24Model to analysis coal mine gas explosion accident were selected as samples. The unsafe act results obtained from the analysis are compared. The results show a low consistency level, which reflects that the reliability of the output needs to be improved. Through analysis, the inconsistency of details in causes description, the difficulty in the cause description and the omission of unsafe acts are the main reasons leading to the above situation. In order to standardize the description of cause items, the components of unsafe acts were defined as “premise + action†, and seven types of premises were summarized to judge unsafe acts. In order to improve the efficiency and reliability of accident analysis, it is suggested that the current data should be taken as reference, and the taxonomy based on consequences should be established to unify unsafe act detail description level, and the corresponding computer software should be developed to assist accident analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingsong Jia & Gui Fu & Xuecai Xie & Shihan Hu & Yuxin Wang & Qian Lyu, 2024. "Study on the reliability of accident analysis results: Taking two groups of four accident analysis references with the 24Model as samples," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(1), pages 172-192, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:1:p:172-192
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221128870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221128870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221128870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:1:p:172-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.