IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i1p69-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability analysis of city gas pipelines subjected to surface loads based on the Kriging model

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyu Peng
  • Ling Xu
  • Jian Gao
  • Chang Liu
  • Jiao Zhou

Abstract

Surface loads imposed on pipelines by illegal buildings in urban areas are common. A surface load can cause ground subsidence and pipeline deformation, as well as accidents such as leakages of oil and gas media and even explosions. In this paper, a pipeline reliability model based on stress–strength interference is established; based on structural reliability theory, the authors analyze the maximum equivalent stress of a pipeline’s dangerous section and pipe yield stress. Through the combination of the Kriging model and the method proposed by the Joint Committee of Structural Safety (JC method), the established limit state equation is approximated as a surrogate model, and the non-normal random variables are normalized using the JC method. The reliability indexes of the pipeline in the frame and brick–concrete structures were solved using MATLAB, and the results were verified and compared using the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) method. Through calculations, the reliability of the pipeline under the surface load of a frame-structure building was 0.9852, while the reliability of the pipeline under a brick-concrete structure was 0.9998, and the relative error with the MCS method was less than 1%. The method used in this paper has good applicability in analyzing the reliability of pressure-occupied pipeline and has certain reference and guiding significance for practical engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyu Peng & Ling Xu & Jian Gao & Chang Liu & Jiao Zhou, 2023. "Reliability analysis of city gas pipelines subjected to surface loads based on the Kriging model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(1), pages 69-79, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:1:p:69-79
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221084824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221084824
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221084824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:1:p:69-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.