IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i1p180-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards the formal performance analysis of multistate coherent systems using HOL theorem proving

Author

Listed:
  • Shahid Ali Murtza
  • Waqar Ahmed
  • Adnan Rashid
  • Osman Hasan

Abstract

Many practical engineering systems and their components have multiple performance levels and failure modes. If these systems form a monotonically increasing structure function (system model) with respect to the performance of their components and also if all of their components affect the overall system performance, then they are said to be multistate coherent systems. Traditionally, the reliability analysis of these multistate coherent systems has been carried out using paper-and-pencil or simulation based methods. The former method is often prone to human errors, while the latter requires high computational resources for large and complex systems having components with multiple operational states. As a complimentary approach, we propose to use Higher-order-logic (HOL) theorem proving to develop a sound reasoning framework to analyze the reliability of multistate coherent systems in this paper. This framework allows us to formally verify generic mathematical properties about multistate coherent systems with an arbitrary number of components and their states. Particularly, we present the HOL formalization of series and parallel multistate coherent systems and formally verify their deterministic and probabilistic properties using the HOL4 theorem prover. For illustration purposes, we present the formal reliability analysis of the multistate oil and gas pipeline to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahid Ali Murtza & Waqar Ahmed & Adnan Rashid & Osman Hasan, 2023. "Towards the formal performance analysis of multistate coherent systems using HOL theorem proving," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(1), pages 180-194, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:1:p:180-194
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221074441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221074441
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221074441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:1:p:180-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.