IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i6p911-922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social structure of 70 years of literature on Human Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Marilia A Ramos
  • Riccardo Patriarca
  • Nicola Paltrinieri

Abstract

From its first applications to the military domain, HRA progressed to applications in Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) operations, when development and validation of methods mainly targeted their use in Probabilistic Risk Assessments. In recent years, advances in HRA include the extension to various application fields, the development of new methods or enhancement of existing ones, data collection efforts, among others. These advances are possible due to the increasing number of authors on HRA and collaboration between them. Systematic literature reviews have been increasingly used for understanding various aspects of a research field. While recent reviews have provided an overview of the topics addressed by HRA research, the social structure of the field has not yet been fully explored. This paper discusses the social structure of HRA through 70 years of literature. The review aims at responding to how the links between different authors groups were created, that is, which large-scale projects, geographical proximity, or research topics contributed to these connections. The results indicate that (1) while the research on HRA was mostly based in the U.S.A. before 2000, China, Japan, and South Korea are significant contributors to the recent literature; (2) despite the increasing diversity of application fields, such as applications to the maritime and offshore industry, the main focus on NPPs operations is persistent since the 1980s; (3) due to large research projects, favored by a connected world, the physical workspace does not limit current collaboration among authors.

Suggested Citation

  • Marilia A Ramos & Riccardo Patriarca & Nicola Paltrinieri, 2022. "The social structure of 70 years of literature on Human Reliability," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(6), pages 911-922, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:6:p:911-922
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211053122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211053122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211053122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:6:p:911-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.