IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i5p879-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using expert judgement techniques to assess reliability for long service-life components: An application to railway wheelsets

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Leite
  • Virgínia Infante
  • António R. Andrade

Abstract

Due to uncertainties in the deterioration process of long service-life assets, assessing reliability and planning maintenance and inspection activities are often difficult tasks. Most of the methods developed use operational or historical data from the manufacturer to predict the deterioration of the asset and estimate its reliability. However, in practice, such failure data is often scarce (e.g. very rare events) and the reliability prediction models might not be adapted to the operation of the user. In addition, available data gathered from maintenance or inspection tasks might only inform about a short period of time, and it might be difficult to obtain the corresponding reliability predictions as the associated uncertainty is still significant. Hence, this paper introduces a reliability assessment method that quantifies uncertainties regarding the failure of long service-life components. It combines Cooke’s classical method (also known as Structured Expert Judgement) with a histogram technique, creating a performance-based method to assess uncertainty in components lifetime distributions. A case study on railway wheelsets is analysed to illustrate the effectiveness of such approach. The results show that the presented method is able to assess failure rates, which can support decisions in reliability-based maintenance of engineering systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Leite & Virgínia Infante & António R. Andrade, 2022. "Using expert judgement techniques to assess reliability for long service-life components: An application to railway wheelsets," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 879-892, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:879-892
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211034650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211034650
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211034650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:879-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.