IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i5p866-878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal allocation of reliability improvement target under dependent component failures

Author

Listed:
  • Dain Kim
  • Kyungmee O. Kim

Abstract

We study the problem of apportioning the reliability improvement target of a series system to components by considering the failure risk and improvement cost when both common cause and cascading failures exist. To solve this problem, previous research has developed different allocation weights in which every component is improved independently in proportion to the allocation weight. In practice, however, allocation weights are not independent among components because several components improve simultaneously when the occurrences of common cause failures are reduced. Therefore, in this study, we partition dependent component failures into mutually exclusive sub-failures to express the system risk in terms of the risk of component sub-failures, where the common cause failures, and cascading failures are incorporated into occurrence and severity evaluations, respectively. Then, an optimization problem is considered to maximize the effectiveness of the system improvement, which is measured as the difference between the decreased failure risk and the increased improvement cost. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate that a component selected for improvement at a low budget would not necessarily be selected at a high budget if different marginal improvement costs were associated with different component failures. In other words, components are selected for improvement only if the reduction in the risk is sufficiently large to offset the improvement cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Dain Kim & Kyungmee O. Kim, 2022. "Optimal allocation of reliability improvement target under dependent component failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 866-878, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:866-878
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211035635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211035635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211035635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:866-878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.