IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i5p855-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BEPU robustness analysis via perturbed law-based sensitivity indices

Author

Listed:
  • Bertrand Iooss
  • Vanessa Vergès
  • Vincent Larget

Abstract

The “best-estimate plus uncertainty†(BEPU) methodology is the term used in the nuclear engineering community when dealing with uncertainty quantification issues in realistic numerical simulation models. One of the most critical hypothesis in these studies is the choice of the probability distributions of uncertain input variables which are propagated through the model. Bringing stringent justifications to the BEPU approach, especially in a safety study, requires quantifying the impact of potential uncertainty on the input variable distribution. To solve this problem, this paper deepens the robustness analysis based on the “Perturbed Law-based sensitivity Indices†(PLI). The PLI quantifies the impact of a perturbation of an input distribution on the quantity of interest (as a quantile of a model output or a safety margin) in the BEPU study. The mathematical formalism of the PLI is applied to two particular quantities of interest: the quantile and the superquantile. For both quantities, the PLI can be easily computed using a unique Monte-Carlo sample containing model inputs and output. Numerical tests are developed in order to define validity criteria of a PLI-based robustness analysis. The practical use of the method is illustrated on thermal-hydraulic computer experiments, simulating a cold leg Intermediate Break Loss Of Coolant Accident (IBLOCA) in a pressurized water nuclear reactor.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertrand Iooss & Vanessa Vergès & Vincent Larget, 2022. "BEPU robustness analysis via perturbed law-based sensitivity indices," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 855-865, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:855-865
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211036569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211036569
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211036569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:855-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.