IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i5p751-760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure behavior of multi-state system considering functional and physical isolation effects

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Chen
  • Ze Wang
  • Yanfang Wang
  • Rui Kang

Abstract

The multi-state system (MSS) is a system that may exhibit multiple states or performance levels. Most existing studies assumed that the transition probabilities from states to states are known. However, in practical engineering, the complex stress conditions lead to great difficulty of collecting the statistical data of state transitions. In this paper, based on physics-of-failure theory, we consider different levels of damages caused by failure mechanisms (FMs) are the main reasons to components’ multiple states. Besides, the physical isolation (PI) effect on degradations of FMs is also studied, which is neglected in the existing studies about the MSS with functional dependence groups. Decision-diagram based methods are used for modeling the failure behavior of the MSS. An automatic collision avoidance system is analyzed for illustrating the proposed modeling and analyzing methods. The results show that comparing to the results without the consideration of PI effect, the probabilities of different states with PI effect of multi-state components and system may decrease or increase, which depends on the actual PI effects to the stress conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Chen & Ze Wang & Yanfang Wang & Rui Kang, 2022. "Failure behavior of multi-state system considering functional and physical isolation effects," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 751-760, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:751-760
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211041848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211041848
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211041848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:5:p:751-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.