IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i4p598-616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep learning health state prognostics of physical assets in the Oil and Gas industry

Author

Listed:
  • Joaquín Figueroa Barraza
  • Luis Guarda Bräuning
  • Ruben Benites Perez
  • Carlos Bittencourt Morais
  • Marcelo Ramos Martins
  • Enrique Lopez Droguett

Abstract

Due to its capital-intensive nature, the Oil and Gas industry requires high operational standards to meet safety and environmental requirements, while maintaining economical returns. In this context, maintenance policies play a crucial role in the avoidance of unplanned downtimes and enhancement of productivity. In particular, Condition-Based Maintenance is an approach in which maintenance actions are performed depending on the assets’ health state that is evaluated through different kinds of sensors. In this paper, Deep Learning methods are explored and different models are proposed for health state prognostics of physical assets in two real-life cases from the Oil and Gas industry: a Natural Gas treatment plant in an offshore production platform where elevated levels of CO 2 must be predicted, and a sea water injection pump for oil extraction stimulation, in which several degradation levels must be predicted. A general methodology for preprocessing the available multi-sensor data and developing proper models is proposed and apply in both case studies. In the first one, a LSTM autoencoder is developed, achieving precision values over 83.5% when predicting anomalous states up to 8 h ahead. In the second case study, a CNN-LSTM model is proposed for the pump’s health state prognostics 48 h ahead, achieving precision values above 99% for all possible pump health states.

Suggested Citation

  • Joaquín Figueroa Barraza & Luis Guarda Bräuning & Ruben Benites Perez & Carlos Bittencourt Morais & Marcelo Ramos Martins & Enrique Lopez Droguett, 2022. "Deep learning health state prognostics of physical assets in the Oil and Gas industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(4), pages 598-616, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:4:p:598-616
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20976817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20976817
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20976817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:4:p:598-616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.